The Nehru Family
At the very beginning of his book, "The Nehru Dynasty", astrologer K. N. Rao mentions the names of Jawahar Lal's father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal's father was believed to be Moti Lal and Moti Lal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawahar Lal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that!
Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines, etc. to Anand Bhavan, previously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once belonged to a Muslim lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Moti Lal was earlier an employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer's name? One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal
grandfathers. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then no where we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name? It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.
This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes. Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.
The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan
University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself, while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital.Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why?
When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption. On this subject, writes M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on page 94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage.
It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities.
Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus.Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.
Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra's court dancer rather offensive!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus' house in New Delhi. And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father, Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry his daughter.
And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka.
It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus' book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.
Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very graphically described by M. O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru Age", page 206. Mathai writes: "In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasin named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses.
One day S. D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and she visited Nehru at midnight...
"Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the
convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in
which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them...
"I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tight-lipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was."Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters.
The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press
conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.
It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today! The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate.Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time.
And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per vedic rites in full view of India's public.
This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification - being married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi herself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family.------------
Misdeeds of Nehru
J.L.Nehru made blunders throughout his life and they are endless but let me put a few for the Hindus and Hindu leaders to pledge once for all to get rid of his denasty which is the nastiest the world has ever seen
[1] The foundation of free India was laid wrongly so what we are building as India since independence is bound to be faulty.
For example he appointed Maulana Azad as education minister of India has ruined the education in India.
[2]He declared ceasefire when Indian Army was advancing and victorious against Pakistan in 1948 turned our victory into worse than defeat and as a result we are suffering and lost onethird of Ksahmir which under the control of enemy called Azad Kashmir.
[3] He gave part of West Bengal to East Pakistan in 1961 .Where was the Parliament and and constitution of India.?
[4]INDIA LOST TIBET TO CHINA UNDER THE EMPTY SLOGANS OF HINDI CHINI BHAI BHAI WHEN Chou en Lai visited India in 1953 later Nehru withdrew India military from Tibet because the Army was there since British Raj.Nehru did this against military advise.
[5] Nehru took the Kashmir issue to UNO WAS A BLUNDER.
[6]BEFORE PARTITION IN THE ELECTION OF LEADER TO HEAD THE GOVERNMENT NEHRU WAS DEFEATED BY SADAR BALLABH BHAI PATEL BY MJORITY OF 19 VOTES BUT DURATMA m.k.Gandhi destroyed the ballot papers and made Nehru the leader.
NEHRU WROTE THE FOLLOWINGS ABOUT HINDUS ON 13 .11.1933AND I QUOTE
The Hindu is certainly not tolerant and is certainly narrow indeed than almost any person in any other country accept the Jew.
-------------------J.L.Nehru.
The Teen Murti house in New Delhi which was the P.M. residence is a Nehru museum this must be closed and all the articles must either be sold or destroyed and the buiding must be used for national purpose.
Shanti ghat, Rasjghat and Vijayghat must be uprooted and instead of these Samadhis statues of true herores must be erected to inspire the youth.
Lastly we would have been far better of withour these Nehrus and Gandhis.
The present Gandhis Sonia and Raul would destroy the Hindu-India so they must go by whatever means possible.
DR.S.SHARMA
=========================
Here is an interesting story printed in Hindustan Times. Unlike Gandhi, who described the roar of IAF planes as "music to his ears"; Nehru actually wanted to get the army scrapped? Similarly, the new avatar of Nehru, aka MM Singh wants India to get de-nuked. He is using the "deal" to get that thing accomplished. After all, the "oh, you see India needs energy" argument just does not make sense at all. So, what is the purpose of the "deal" {actually a sellout} if not to defang Indian nuclear assets?)
'Nehru wanted Army scrapped'
Asian News International
Lahore, August 21, 2006|20:16 IST
The Kashmir war saved the Indian Army from being scrapped, seems strange? Well, a biography of Major General AA "Jick" Rudra of the Indian Army by Major General DK "Monty" Palit claims so.
According to the book, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru blew his top when Lt General Sir Robert Lockhart, the first commander in chief of India took a strategic plan for a Government directive on defence policy.
"Shortly after independence, General Lockhart as the army chief took a strategic plan to the prime minister, asking for a government directive on the defence policy. He came back to Jick's office shell-shocked. When asked what happened, he replied, The PM took one look at my paper and blew his top. 'Rubbish! Total rubbish!' he shouted. 'We don't need a defence plan. Our policy is ahimsa (non-violence). We foresee no military threats. Scrap the army! The police are good enough to meet our security needs'," the Daily Times quotes the book as saying.
According to the book, Jick believed the Kashmir war saved the Indian Army.
"General Sir Douglas Gracie had been appointed commander-in-chief of the Pakistan Army and he and General Lockhart daily exchanged information about refugees traversing Punjab in both directions. One day in late October 1947, Gracie mentioned that he had had reports of tribesmen massing in the area of Attock-Rawalpindi. Both men knew that cross-border raids from Pakistan had been mounted against Poonch. Kashmir was not a part of the dominion of India and Lockhart felt that the tribesmen posed no threat to India. He did not pass on the information to the ministry or general staff," the paper said.
"When confronted by Nehru three months later, he admitted this and added that he may have been remiss. Nehru turned to him and asked the general if his sympathies were with Pakistan? Aghast, Lockhart replied, 'Mr prime minister if you have to ask me that question, I have no business being the commander-in-chief of your forces. I know that there is a boat leaving Bombay in a few days, carrying British officers and their families to England. I shall be on it'," it added.
According to the biography General Lockhart called up his Military Secretary Jick Rudra the next day, January 26 1948, and suggested he start looking around for a successor since he had resigned from his post.
On Aug 23, Moti Kaul <mkpa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Jeevanji
Your FORTHRIGHTNESS ,CLARITY & HITTING UNDER THE BELT are commendable. India as a nation is
passing through challenging times. It is easy to Counter & Destroy the known enemies, but those within,
in the garb of Pseudo Human Activists ,need to be Exposed & Condemned.
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008From: madangupta...@yahoo.comSubject:
Humanitarian Crisis in Jammu and Kashmir- IKF responds
Hon. Zuthshi Ji,
Job well done.
These are the paid people of Madam. BHARE KE TATOO.
madan gupta--- On Fri, 8/22/08, JEEVANZUT...@aol.com <JEEVANZUT...@aol.com> wrote:
Humanitarian Crisis in Jammu and Kashmir- IKF respondsTo: kashmir-interchange@googlegroups.com, Honorable Members of the Peace loving International community:
The following letter (the final draft), in response to Dr. Angana Chatterji's letter titled 'Humanitarian Crisis in Jammu and Kashmir' to the U.N., was mailed on August 20, 2008 to:
Justice Navanethem Pillay, High Commissioner;
Dr. Kyung-wha Kang, Deputy High Commissioner;Ms. Gay McDougall, Independent Expert on minority issuesOffice of the High Commissioner for Human RightsUnited Nations, Palais des NationsCH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland.
A copy is being sent through this mail to:
Dr. Angana Chatterji, Associate Professor, Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology,
California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, California, USA
Dr. Haley Duschinski, Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ohio University, USA
Dr. Shubh Mathur, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, A
We hope to receive a response soon which will be shared with these groups.
Regards,
Jeevan Zutshi
International Kashmir Federation
Justice Navanethem Pillay, High CommissionerDr. Kyung-wha Kang, Deputy High CommissionerMs. Gay McDougall, Independent Expert on minority issuesOffice of the High Commissioner for Human RightsUnited Nations, Palais des NationsCH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Dated: August 21, 2008
Subject: Humanitarian Crisis in Jammu and Kashmir
Dear Justice Pillay, Dr. Kang, Ms. McDougall,
Dr. Angana Chatterji's letter to the U.N dated August 12, 2008 didn't come as a surprise to us having read similar letters and comments in the past from her. We are deeply saddened by the insensitivity that she has persistently shown toward Hindus of Jammu and Kashmir who have been targeted by the Islamic fundamentalists and terrorists. Everyone, including the U.N., is aware how 350,000 Kashmiri Hindus (Pandits) had to flee Kashmir valley in early 1990 after thousands were murdered by the Muslim terrorists.She, in her letter is asking for immediate action to be taken to stop the violence against the Muslim minority in Jammu and bring those responsible to justice. Since she is talking about Human Rights, how could she ignore the Human Rights violations against the Hindu civilians who have been living as refugees since 1990 in their own country, after losing everything? Is she implying that these 350,000 Hindus driven out from Kashmir have no Human Rights? It is clear that when she talks about Human Rights, she is only referring to Muslims. Isn't it shameful to be so biased and have such a distorted view of the civilized world?It is known to the civilized world that thousands of temples have been demolished and destroyed by Islamic fundamentalists in Kashmir. Why is she pretending that she is not aware of what is going on? The economic blockade was caused because of the violence manufactured and planned by the separatists and terrorist elements in Kashmir valley and not by any government action. It was a peaceful protest against the gross mishandling of Human Rights violations made by the J&K State Government towards Amaranth Pilgrims'. It was escalated due to the inhumane treatment and desecration of the Dead Body of a peaceful Protestor. Please hear the truth in the live radio interview of one of the spokesperson of Sangarsh Samiti in Jammu who are being blamed for such blockade at:http://supportamarnath.org/paneldiscussion.php.
Doesn't she feel any obligation towards the Amarnath Yatris, who deserve better amenities? Are you aware of the amenities provided to Haj yatris by the Govt. of India? Do you know how many corers of rupees GOI pays for Haj subsidies? Why should Kashmiri Muslims oppose giving better amenities to Amarnath Yatris? Why do Kashmiri Muslims consider Hindus as tress passers and would allow them only as visitors? Why can't Kashmiri Muslims tolerate their own Kashmiri Hindu Brethren with whom they have lived for centuries?
> Let me make one clarification so you understand that it is a People's Movement for Human Rights for Amarnath Yatris. If you are really a Human Rights Activist, you should support this movement and not join hands with terrorists. Jammu & Kashmir is a secular state in which Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Budhists have lived in peace while it used to be run by Maharaja Hari Singh, who happened to be a resident of Jammu before partition in 1947. Current crises are the result of shift in seat of Power from Jammu to Srinagar region. Aspirations of common Hindu citizens of the state have been trampled by the unruly Muslim dominated successive governments that have systematically marginalized the basic tenants of civil liberties to its Hindu population. Appeasement policies of Central Government for last sixty years towards majority Muslim population of the state are responsible for the current events. Why can't a Kashmiri Hindu be Chief Minister or Governor of the J&K State ?
I hope she can remove her blinds and prejudices, change her beliefs and become a true Human Rights advocate. Please let us know if we are required to produce the evidence and the issue of Islamic terrorism against the Hindu minority in Kashmir.
Sincerely Yours,Jeevan Zutshi Chairman, International Kashmir FederationJeevanZutshi.com
Email: internationalkashmirfederat...@gmail.com
( hari krishnamurthy K. HARIHARAN)"'' When people hurt you Over and Over think of them as Sand paper.They Scratch & hurt you, but in the end you are polished and they are finished. ''"Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that, but the really great ones make you feel that you too, can become great."- Mark Twain.
No comments:
Post a Comment